Website Development

We set limits before the build starts: how much JavaScript ships on first load, how large the hero image may be, how many fonts and weights get requested. Those numbers are checked as the build progresses rather than measured once at the end.

The expensive mistakes are almost always the same three. Uncompressed hero media. A heavy animation library loaded for one small effect. Fonts that block rendering. All three are avoidable at the point the decision gets made and painful to unwind later.

Where heavier visual work genuinely earns its place, we scope it: load it after the page is interactive, reduce its complexity on small screens, and switch it off entirely for visitors who have asked for reduced motion.

Headings run in order. Buttons are buttons and links are links. Forms have real labels associated with real inputs. Landmarks exist so a screen reader user can skip to the content.

None of that is visible in a screenshot, and all of it affects how the site is understood by assistive technology and by search crawlers. It also makes the CSS simpler, because the structure already describes the content.

Forms need to reach the place the business actually checks. That might be a CRM, a shared inbox, a scheduling tool, or all three. We wire it to the real workflow and confirm delivery before launch.

Payments, booking, email marketing, and analytics all get the same treatment: connected, tested with live credentials in a staging context, and documented so the next person can find the wiring.

Contrast gets checked against the actual palette in use. Focus states are designed rather than inherited. Interactive components are reachable and operable from the keyboard, and motion respects the operating system preference.

We build toward WCAG best practice. We do not claim guaranteed compliance, because that claim requires independent verification and anyone who offers it casually is selling something.